WebThe appellants in this appeal ("the plaintiffs") are the personal representatives of Leo Thomas Mackenzie Coltman deceased who was, at the date of his death, employed by … Web“Includes” Does it mean includes only or does it mean it includes this as an example of many other things which might fall under this section? Coltman v Bibby Tankers (1998) – liability for defective equipment ‘includes’ A, B and C. does that mean it does not ‘include’ X?
Lecture 13- Reading Legislation - Lecture - Studocu
WebColtman v Bibby Tankers Ltd (Derbyshire) [1988] AC 276. ... Act 1969 had intended that Act to embrace merchant ships in the word "equipment" in section 1(1)( ) that word would have been defined in section 1(3) in a manner which includes vehicles and aircraft but does not include merchant ships. But I recognise the strength of the submission ... WebShe was a large ship, 91,000 tons gross, 964 feet long, laden with 157,000 tons of iron ore on a voyage from Canada to Japan. She was built by Swan Hunter in 1975. The plaintiffs … people doing tricks on youtube
Coltman and Another V Bibby Tankers LTD The PDF
WebIt has also been held that a ship can be “defective equipment” under the Act (Coltman v Bibby Tankers [1988] AC 276 HL). ... Torquay Hotel Co v Cousins [1969] 2 Ch 106. Cousins and other members of the same union disrupted oil supplies to the Torquay Hotel, by persuading lorry drivers not to carry it. There was a force majeure clause in the ... WebCase: Coltman v Bibby Tankers [1988] AC 276 Health And Safety At Work: Back to 1898 Deans Court Chambers (Chambers of Craig Sephton QC) Personal Injury Law Journal … WebColtman v Bibby Tankers (1988) It was claimed by the plaintiff that the ship was defectively constructed, and he argued that this constituted defects in equipment on the basis that the ship was ‘equipment’ within s 1 of the Employers’ Liability (Defective Equipment) Act 1969. The court held that the meaning of the word ‘equipment’ was ... people doing yoga on youtube